HIdden Intellectualism By: David Graff
Graff invites us to join his world of contrasting ideas, and challenges
us with his theories on the dichotomy between different types of intellect. The
dominant theme of the paper is a cry of frustration that these different types
of intellect are not widely appreciated let alone recognized in the modern
world.
“What
we've got here is... failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach. So
you get what we had here last week, which is the way he wants it... well, he
gets it. I don't like it any more than you men.” – Cool Hand Luke
While there are many complexities to the point that Graff makes, the
keystone of his idea is very heartbreakingly simple. It is the mere lack of communication
between human beings on the simplest level, the human level. Coming from a
childhood that presented him with a first hand look at this lack of
communication, he is more than qualified to make this cry. Since the beginning
of time the marriage between coolness and intellectualism has been a rocky one.
There are numerous times in history where intellectual aristocrats were the
coolest people in town, and then there were times when the most brilliant minds
of all time were considered to be crazy. Mankind eventually realizes that it
was wrong, yet the idea still continues to perpetuate. In the recent cycle of
this rocky marriage, intellect and being the cool has had its recent separation
in the 50’s. Graff expresses frustration in the idea that this marriage has
again wined and dined its way into the honeymoon phase, but we (the United
States) as a culture are too stubborn to realize this. In our new age, you
cannot only be cool and smart, but there are also new definitions of what smart
is. He doesn’t just accuse the
(formally- from an academic point of view) uneducated for showing dislike in
the academics, but also the academics themselves for not providing the means to
break down this wall. He does not entirely discredit people in the last 60
years mentioning Elvis’s (Viewed as the coolest man of his time) view on the
candidates in the 1956 election stating that, “I don’t dig the intellectual
bit, but I’m telling you, man, he knows the most.” He wonders if the scars that
wrote learning left on a generation will ever be healed, if academia will leave
open doors for different types of intellect, and if those hidden intellects
will ever knock on the closed doors of academia.
“Mr. Gorbachev tear down this wall!!” – Ronald Reagan
If Mr. Graff was the Prime Minister of France during Nazi occupation in
World War II, I would like to ever so gallantly self proclaim myself as the
head of La Résistance. If I were writing an autobiography of myself, which I
hope to one day be of enough importance to do so, this topic would certainly be
a major chapter. I grew up in a somewhat aristocratic town and went to private
school that bred kids for top-notch prep schools and went to a public high
school that even bred kids for nothing short of Ivy League. In my private
school days, I was the athlete that Mr. Graff describes. Instead of spending
all my time with kids who went home to tutors and a maid preparing lunch for
them, I went to play hockey with kids on the other side of the tracks. Kids
that Graff describes as “thugs”. I would throw my button down in the hamper,
and head off to hockey. In the locker room I was educated on swear words and
got an update on how many hubcaps they had stolen from cars that day. I found
myself in the middle of two contrasting worlds and yet I was never really part of
either. I had to be two different people in two different worlds and in reality
I only wanted to be a little bit of both. I thought my private school friends
were a little too serious and my sports friends a little too thuggy. This is
was my boot camp for La Résistance.
In high school I found myself stuck in another facet of Graffs argument.
All of a sudden I was playing sports with the public school kids. Those kids
liked to have a good time, not playing chess, yet not stealing hubcaps. There was
a problem though, which again is portrayed in Graff’s theories (truths). I was
hanging out with all these cool kids and conversing with them on an
intellectual level and acting on the same intellectual level, but not in
school. All those kids were making honors every quarter and partying and
playing sports. I was smart, I knew it, but the high school I was in did not
have an open door for people like me. Because of my boot camp, I had intellect;
it was not the kind of intellect that my friends had. I was frustrated, my high
school had a cookie cutter feel and if you were a different shape, well that
was just too bad. I would do really well in the very few classes that were made
for minds like mine, better than my honor roll friends, only suffer so much in
the cookie cutter classes that defaced my GPA to that of someone who is
completely incapable of being intellectual. I’m not going to pump my own tires
and list everything I think I am excellent at right now, but I was frustrated.
Coming to college I thought things would be different, but tragically they are
the same. I thought classes in college would be different, but my first
semester rained on that parade. I had a meeting with a dean last semester who
received reports from two professors with concerns that one of the most
seemingly capable students in class discussion was doing surprisingly poorly in
their classes and they didn’t want me to be frustrated. In my toughest class
last semester, I did the best and in my what should have been easiest class, I
did the worst. I was frustrated. I am still frustrated. This semester I ignored
distribution requirements and signed up for classes that I know I would love
and do well in.
The truth is we live in exponential times, and the spectrum of different
kinds of intellects has broadened exponentially. That is why it is so important
that we break down the wall of cookie cutter academia and cater to students not
just like me, but also at the opposite end of the spectrum. Capabilities of the
millennial generation are being over looked and under stimulated. Capabilities
of the future of America are being over looked and under stimulated. Maybe I am
crazy for thinking this, but Pythagoras said the earth was round and they
called him crazy. Maybe Graff is wrong, but I believe him. Some people thought
La Résistance was wrong, but that was Hitler.
Your post is strong in developing your autobiographical reflection on the issues Graff raises, following his lead. We will be doing this in the first project. You can sharpen that analysis a bit by returning to Graff's words at key points, bring in a specific quotation to elaborate your understanding of his argument.
ReplyDeleteAs far as style and tone, this looks to be on track: the writing here is moving toward the more formal focus of an essay, but still exploring and practicing, a bit more in conversation with the immediate reading.